Sysvol inconsistent

Skip to main content.

Subscribe to RSS

Select Product Version. All Products. It is recommended that these permissions be consistent. Contact an administrator who has rights to modify security on this GPO. This issue occurs because the access control list ACL on the Sysvol portion of the Group Policy object is set to inherit permissions from the parent folder.

For more information about how to download Windows Server Service Pack 1, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: How to obtain the latest service pack for Windows Server Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft products that are listed in the "Applies to" section of this article. If you have permissions to modify security on the default GPOs, click OK in response to the message that is described in the "Symptoms" section.

sysvol inconsistent

In this case, Group Policy will remove the inheritance attribute in the Sysvol folder. More Information. If you do so, this may cause Group Policy processing on the client to fail, or certain users who generally have access may no longer be able to edit a GPO. Additionally, file system objects and directory service objects do not have the same available permissions because they are different types of objects.

When permissions mismatch, it may not be easy to make them consistent. Last Updated: Apr 10, Was this information helpful? Yes No. Safetec hand sanitizer 8 oz us what we can do to improve the article Submit.

sysvol inconsistent

Your feedback will help us improve the support experience. Australia - English. Bosna i Hercegovina - Hrvatski.I am getting the following error when I open the Group Policy and click on any group policy objects. It doesn't matter on which domain I check them I get the same error. Have to say that everything is working fine although I get this error.

I tried most of the solutions but still same issue. I dont have deny access in my group policies and its happening for all of them. I mean it doesn't matter which group policy i am clicking i get the same message. To continue this discussion, please ask a new question. Get answers from your peers along with millions of IT pros who visit Spiceworks. Hi I am getting the following error when I open the Group Policy and click on any group policy objects.

Which of the following retains the information it's storing when the system power is turned off? Simon Matthews This person is a verified professional. Verify your account to enable IT peers to see that you are a professional.

Armin Jun 4, at UTC. Prototype Jun 4, at UTC. I have a similar issue. I've found an issue but can't fix it persistently. Remove this and the error goes away. Edit the GPO, the right is added back and the edit recurs. Obviously, my "fix" isn't really working.

Anyone know a more permanent solution? This topic has been locked by an administrator and is no longer open for commenting. Read these nextView solution. View Solution. Why EE? Courses Ask. Get Access.

Log In. Web Dev. We help IT Professionals succeed at work. Last Modified: Suddenly, when trying to access Group Policy module, I am getting a message on a Windows server device that says "the permissions for this gpo in the sysvol folder are inconsistent with those in active directory. It is recommended that these permissions be consistent. I have searched this message and have only found articles on older OS versions. Any advice on why this is happening now and how to handle it?

Start Free Trial. View Solution Only. Noah Hardware Tester and Debugger. Commented: Hi there!

sysvol inconsistent

Shaun Vermaak Senior Consultant. Awarded This award recognizes a new member of Experts Exchange who has made outstanding contributions within their first year. Distinguished Expert This award recognizes someone who has achieved high tech and professional accomplishments as an expert in a specific topic. Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial. Lul, I thought he knew that? Get your personalized solution. Ask The Experts.I have a domain with a single Server not R2 DC. I'm now trying to add a second DC running R2.

Also at that time there is 1 event logged with ID I've tried Googling these events but have not been able to find a solution yet.

Here are the event details:. My understanding for a scenario such as this is that when mrserver01 was promoted it overwrites the record. So now this record belongs to the mrserver01 and mrserver01old's record was dumped. You should be able to manually recreate the record under topology for mrserver01 and then set the msDFSR-MemberReference attribute. I believe the renaming process for a domain namespace is more involved then the netdom needed for domain controller.

Since this is the Domain System Volume I'm not sure how to fix entirely yet. Create Diagnostics report, Health Report. Does that provide any additional insight? On the first DC servermr01oldwhen creating the report the only member it lists is servermr Should it list itself as a member as well? Attached is a screenshot of the report. I'm beginning to wonder if it'd be easier to demote the new DC, rename it, then restore my backup of the first DC from Friday night before I made any changes to it.

Look at the distinguished Name, does it match up with the correct DC name? I'm not sure this would work properly for you though since you renamed it, and then created a new server with the same name as the old one.

So doing it via their method could screw it up worse. Fyi, for me when I create new DC's I rotate names. This way I've never had issues with something like this using the same name and causing confusion.

Look at the properties of mrserver01 under this location. DYRyet - yes the only entry under Topology is servermr01, not servermr01old. The properties are correct. When I try to set the key above, it says name reference is invalid, which is correct since servermr01old doesn't exist under Topology. Is there a way to manually add the entry under Topology using adsiedit? I was able to create the entry and restart the DFS Replication service.

Now when I run the health report all it complains about is the DFS replication service restarting frequently duh! Thanks for all your help with this! To continue this discussion, please ask a new question.

Get answers from your peers along with millions of IT pros who visit Spiceworks. Here are the event details: Old server: Text. Best Answer. Thai Pepper. DYRyet This person is a verified professional. Verify your account to enable IT peers to see that you are a professional.Skip to main content. Select Product Version. All Products. It is recommended that these permissions be consistent. Contact an administrator who has rights to modify security on this GPO. This issue occurs for one of the following reasons: The access control list ACL on the Sysvol part of the Group Policy Object is set to inherit permissions from the parent folder.

The Special permission List object is set for the Authenticated Users group. In this situation, Group Policy removes the inheritance attribute in the Sysvol folder.

If you still receive the message, follow these steps: Make sure that you are running the latest service pack for the system. For more information, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: How to obtain the latest service pack for Windows Server How to obtain the latest service pack for Windows Server Last Updated: Nov 29, Was this information helpful?

Yes No. Tell us what we can do to improve the article Submit. Your feedback will help us improve the support experience. Australia - English. Bosna i Hercegovina - Hrvatski. Canada - English. Crna Gora - Srpski. Danmark - Dansk. Deutschland - Deutsch. Eesti - Eesti. Hrvatska - Hrvatski. India - English. Indonesia Bahasa - Bahasa. Ireland - English. Italia - Italiano. Malaysia - English. Nederland - Nederlands.Skip to main content. Select Product Version. All Products. The article describes how to use the Burflags registry entry to rebuild each domain controller's copy of the system volume SYSVOL tree on all domain controllers in a common Active Directory directory service domain.

Use this procedure only if you cannot make the FRS functional on individual domain controllers in the domain. Use this procedure only if the bulk restart can be performed more quickly than troubleshooting and resolving replication inconsistencies, and time to resolution is a critical factor.

Important Domain controllers will not service authentication request during the procedure. This procedure should not be performed during peak hours. Note See the "How to temporarily stabilize the domain SYSVOL tree" section of this article for information about how to temporarily stabilize the domain SYSVOL tree until you can complete all the steps in the "How to rebuild the domain system volume replica set across enterprise environments" section. We strongly recommend that you monitor FRS performance and health by using monitoring tools.

By using monitoring tools, you may prevent the need for replica set authoritative and non-authoritative restores, and you may provide insight into the root cause of FRS failures.

The following monitoring tool is available for download: Ultrasound Ultrasound is a powerful tool that measures the functioning of FRS replica sets by providing health ratings and historical information of these sets. More Information. Guidelines Important This section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry.

Confirm SYSVOL inconsistencies with PowerShell

However, serious problems might occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you follow these steps carefully. For added protection, back up the registry before you modify it.

Then, you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: How to back up and restore the registry in Windows.

Last Updated: Apr 28, Was this information helpful? Yes No. Tell us what we can do to improve the article Submit. Your feedback will help us improve the support experience.

Australia - English. Bosna i Hercegovina - Hrvatski. Canada - English. Crna Gora - Srpski. Danmark - Dansk.

Setting up DFS in Windows Server 2012 R2 with Replication

Deutschland - Deutsch. Eesti - Eesti. Hrvatska - Hrvatski. India - English. Indonesia Bahasa - Bahasa. Ireland - English. Italia - Italiano. Malaysia - English. Nederland - Nederlands. New Zealand - English. Philippines - English.So I start working for a company, and I've been tasked with leading the move to a modern, cloud based infrastructure.

First port of call is to get the whole domain upgraded to Server The previous guy, who looked after the domain, left months ago and no-one really knows what state it's in. I hear various complaints from other members of IT, that there have been unexplained difficulties with folder redirection and other policy based settings, so I set out to discover the truth. At first everything seemed to be in order. The service desk manager approached me, and asked if I knew why he had a desktop background from last Christmas suddenly appear on his machine.

I didn't immediately realise, but the background had appeared due to him visiting another site which hadn't replicated in the 7 months since Christmas. The real "Oh Dear Whilst investigating the corrupt policy, another member of IT asked me, to look at why the latest desktop background hadn't appeared on anyone's machines.

With the suspicion already pointing to FRS issues, I went hunting and found that only 1 domain controller had the new image, and that none of the others had yet replicated it, despite many scheduled replications having occurred since the image was uploaded. I then notice that one server has no modifications to any files for more than a year, even though I know there should have been changes from the last few days. Now I'm certain FRS isn't working, but having checked through all the logs again, and dug out FRSDiag and Ultrasound, I've still not found any "evidence" on the domain controllers I've checked, but given there are more than sites, I decide it's time to break out PowerShell to build a report of the state for me.

I start by creating a script to compare the state of the Default domain policy, knowing that it has corruption on at least a few domain controllers.

The results were worse than I had expected, while at least 10 domain controllers had replicated the corruption, many others had old versions dating back over a year. Then to make the situation more fun, 2 different certificates required for client machines to function, that are assigned via policy, happen to expire. The corruption and lack of replication of these policies, has resulted in hundreds of client machines suddenly unable to operate correctly.

I attempted to perform a non-authoritative restore on one of the corrupt domain controllers, but due to the replication topology, it just ended up with the corruption again. It quickly became apparent that there were widespread serious FRS issues that I couldn't hope to resolve in a timely manner, in order to get the increasing number of client machines back in a working state. Be Warned! It means you will have to perform a non-authoritative restore on all domain controllers, and you will still have to fix the underlying FRS issues.

In my situation it was the only way to get our users back up and working promptly, while I tracked down the underlying issues that were preventing FRS working. So in order to get our users back in a working state, I decided to copy the policy files onto all the domain controllers.

This will cause more replication issues, but it will also allow our users to continue to work. I simply changed the foreach statment from the script above, to instead forcefully copy the policy from the PDC to all other domain controllers.

I used robocopy instead of copy-item to ensure that all permissions were preserved.